Appeals court allows Trump's travel ban to go partially into effect

- A U.S. appeals court in California on Monday let part of President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban go into effect, ruling that the government can bar entry of people from six Muslim-majority countries if they have no connections to the United States.

A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals partially granted Trumps request to block at least temporarily a judge’s ruling that had put the new ban on hold,  Reuters reported.

Trump’s ban was announced on Sept. 24 and replaced two previous versions that had been impeded by federal courts.

The action, released on Monday, means the ban will apply to people from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad who do not have connections to the United States.

Those connections are defined as family relationships and “formal, documented” relationships with U.S.-based entities such as universities and resettlement agencies. Those with family relationships that would allow entry include grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins of people in the United States.

The state of Hawaii, which sued to block the restrictions, argued that federal immigration law did not give Trump the authority to impose them on six of those countries. U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu ruled last month that Hawaii was likely to succeed with that argument.

Trump issued his first travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries in January, just a week after he took office, and then issued a revised one after the first was blocked by the courts. The second one expired in September after a long court fight and was replaced with another revised version.

The 9th Circuit is due to hear oral arguments in the case on Dec. 6. In a parallel case from Maryland, a judge also ruled against the Trump administration and partially blocked the ban from going into effect, Reuters reported.

An appeal in the Maryland case is being heard on Dec. 8 by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. The Maryland case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents several advocacy groups, including the International Refugee Assistance Project, Reuters reported

Up Next:


Up Next

  • Appeals court allows Trump's travel ban to go partially into effect
  • Trump discounts accusations against Senate candidate Moore
  • MARTA bus blocking things is now the world's greatest meme
  • Finding The Hot Black Friday Tech Deals With Slickdeals.net
  • Breakthrough: Some cases of schizophrenia and bipolar caused by autoimmune disease
  • K9 Nitro does push-ups with two officers, they are ready to fight crime
  • CBS News fires Charlie Rose following sexual misconduct allegations
  • Funeral to say goodbye to Sunnyvale police K-9 killed in line of duty
  • President Trump pardons Thanksgiving turkeys 'Wishbone' and 'Drumstick'
  • McDonald's to demolish museum of 1st restaurant